considered new, and all regulations in the Responsible Neighborhood
Market Act (RNMA) that apply to the new CUP. The RNMA's failure to
account for businesses struck by disasters. ABC (Alcoholic Beverage
Control) violations at the location, and complaints from law enforcement.
Support from other businesses, and people in the area. Protocols for
preventing sales to minors, and whether the operator ever had an incident of
selling to minors. Percentage of alcohol sales occupied by the store's floor
area, and how it contributes to the store's profit. Amount of alcohol sales a
store like this would normally generate. Examples of healthy choices that
would be offered at the store. The proposed operating hours for the
business as outlined within the RNMA. The possibility to condition the
business to operate without tobacco use or selling tobacco paraphernalia.
Past instances the city approved liquor stores near schools and imposed
restrictions on alcohol sales. Whether the establishment would be selling
alcohol from 6:00 a.m. until 2:00 a.m. as currently proposed.
**** While making his motion, Councilmember Esparza stated the motion
was made based on the following findings evidenced in the record: The
applicant is excepted from the location restrictions in the Responsible
Neighborhood Market Act (RNMA) because the use is not within an area
where the Chief of Police has determined that this use would be detrimental
to the health safety and welfare of the people in the area, or increases the
severity of existing law enforcement or public nuisance problems in the area.
This is because the Chief of Police authored memo that was discussed
earlier, dated September 5, 2024, supporting the RNMA location restriction
exemption. Additionally, the sale of alcoholic beverages is incidental and
appurtenant to the larger retail use because the project meets the definition
of a General Market by primarily selling food and grocery items for off-site
preparation and consumption with 54 square feet, to be exact, out of the
total store size of 2,932 square feet dedicated to selling alcoholic beverages.
Additionally, the project would serve as a public convenience or necessity to
an under-served portion of the community without presenting significant
adverse impacts on public health or safety because the project would align
with State priorities to use general markets and small markets to expand
access to foods such as fruits, vegetables, nuts, meats, and dairy products
to a greater number of residents. The input from the surrounding neighbors
weighed very heavily, so their support of this establishment did weigh heavy
in the final decision. Additionally, the primary use of the establishment meets
the definition of a General Market based on the totality of information
provided by the applicants as the Planning Department has already noted
earlier here in the hearing. So, based on the evidence in the record the
findings for the CUP can be made specifically because the proposed use is
allowed within the zone district and complies with all other applicable