considered new, and all regulations in the Responsible Neighborhood  
					Market Act (RNMA) that apply to the new CUP. The RNMA's failure to  
					account for businesses struck by disasters. ABC (Alcoholic Beverage  
					Control) violations at the location, and complaints from law enforcement.  
					Support from other businesses, and people in the area. Protocols for  
					preventing sales to minors, and whether the operator ever had an incident of  
					selling to minors. Percentage of alcohol sales occupied by the store's floor  
					area, and how it contributes to the store's profit. Amount of alcohol sales a  
					store like this would normally generate. Examples of healthy choices that  
					would be offered at the store. The proposed operating hours for the  
					business as outlined within the RNMA. The possibility to condition the  
					business to operate without tobacco use or selling tobacco paraphernalia.  
					Past instances the city approved liquor stores near schools and imposed  
					restrictions on alcohol sales. Whether the establishment would be selling  
					alcohol from 6:00 a.m. until 2:00 a.m. as currently proposed.  
					**** While making his motion, Councilmember Esparza stated the motion  
					was made based on the following findings evidenced in the record: The  
					applicant is excepted from the location restrictions in the Responsible  
					Neighborhood Market Act (RNMA) because the use is not within an area  
					where the Chief of Police has determined that this use would be detrimental  
					to the health safety and welfare of the people in the area, or increases the  
					severity of existing law enforcement or public nuisance problems in the area.  
					This is because the Chief of Police authored memo that was discussed  
					earlier, dated September 5, 2024, supporting the RNMA location restriction  
					exemption. Additionally, the sale of alcoholic beverages is incidental and  
					appurtenant to the larger retail use because the project meets the definition  
					of a General Market by primarily selling food and grocery items for off-site  
					preparation and consumption with 54 square feet, to be exact, out of the  
					total store size of 2,932 square feet dedicated to selling alcoholic beverages.  
					Additionally, the project would serve as a public convenience or necessity to  
					an under-served portion of the community without presenting significant  
					adverse impacts on public health or safety because the project would align  
					with State priorities to use general markets and small markets to expand  
					access to foods such as fruits, vegetables, nuts, meats, and dairy products  
					to a greater number of residents. The input from the surrounding neighbors  
					weighed very heavily, so their support of this establishment did weigh heavy  
					in the final decision. Additionally, the primary use of the establishment meets  
					the definition of a General Market based on the totality of information  
					provided by the applicants as the Planning Department has already noted  
					earlier here in the hearing. So, based on the evidence in the record the  
					findings for the CUP can be made specifically because the proposed use is  
					allowed within the zone district and complies with all other applicable