Rhomie Thompson, Ellen Armour Stein, David Roberts, Elliot Balch, Bruce
Kalkowski, Alicia Rodriguez, Johannus Reijnders, Nasreen Johnson, Monica
Madrigal, Ome Lopez, Christina Soto, Kiel Lopez Schmidt, Smiley, Melanie
Glass, Laura Porter, Des Washington, Haley White, Jennie Guerrero, Dave
Brodie, Brandon Weis, Juan Karlo Muro, Dhani Del Toro, Julio Hernandez,
Jess Fitzpatrick, Jazmen Moore, Grisante Avendano, Erin Burd, Jade
McAfee, Amy Kitchner, Chen Chan Golston, and Andrew Janz. Public
comment closed at 7:46 P.M.
Commission discussion on this item included: public participation
demonstrating strong community engagement and advocacy; commendation
for the arts community for their passionate and organized participation as a
model of effective grassroots organizing; acknowledgment that the current
process is still developing in its second year, and a request for patience to
improve equity; encouragement for similar unity on other important issues;
emphasis on the potential to close disparity gaps through collective action
beyond the arts grant; volunteer nature of the commission’s work and their
ongoing efforts to resolve the matter and distribute funds; importance of
remembering Measure “P’s" origins, and its intent to address funding
disparities in underserved areas; concerns that Southeast Fresno received
only 3% of the current funding allocation, despite contributing tax revenue to
Measure “P”; increase access, such as encouraging arts organizations to
provide tickets or programming to schools in underserved areas; concerns
about transparency and potential conflicts of interest, and clarification on the
Fresno Arts Council’s role in the grant selection process; current funding
decisions follow rules approved by the City Council, and future rounds offer
opportunities for public input and process improvement; past financial
support and participation in local arts organizations and events, including Art
Hop and workshops, in the interest of transparency; recognition that while
flaws in the current system were identified, there is an opportunity to
address them in future sessions; timeline for voting on recommendations,
and clarification the agenda-setting process will determine when that occurs;
moving forward with the grant process while incorporating community
feedback and addressing ongoing challenges; process is a work in progress
and affirmation the commission’s commitment to listening to the public and
valuing their contributions to the arts community; uncertainty about whether
there is a strong consensus to delay or move forward with the process and
requests for clarification from the subcommittee; acknowledgement of
Commissioner Ward for the leadership and extra effort in chairing the
subcommittee and guiding the process; appreciation for the significant effort
made by all commissioners across every subcommittee; and, importance of
avoiding assumptions about divisions between emerging and established
arts organizations.