10:20 A.M.
Hearing to consider Development Permit Application No. P22-01346 and
related Environmental Assessment No. P22-01346 pertaining to ±0.69
acres of property located on the northwest corner of East McKinley and
South Fine Avenues (Council District 4) - Planning & Development
Department.
1. CONSIDER Environmental Assessment (EA) No. P21-01346,
dated December 8, 2022, a determination that the proposed
project is categorically exempt under Section 15332/Class 32
(In-Fill Development Project) of the State of California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines; and,
2. DENY the appeal and UPHOLD the action of the Planning
Commission and Planning and Development Department
Director to approve Development Permit Application No. P22-
01346, authorizing the construction of an automated car wash
facility subject to compliance with the Conditions of Approval
dated December 8, 2022.
The above hearing was called to order at 10:55 A.M.
Planning & Development Department Planning Manager Siegrist, Brady
McGinnis Attorney, Orlando and Seth Ramirez of Ramirez planning and
Muhammad Assad the project applicant, Christopher Hall Attorney
McCormick Barstow (CQEA) presented the hearing. Upon call, the following
members of the public addressed Council: Gerry Mirassou, Jason Hamm,
Lashawn Toney, Xiamy Lee-Yang, Linda Fisher, Carmen Olivares, Marisol
Villa, Sherry Yang, Pao Ly, Mai Chao Yang, Stephanie Lee-Hirata, Manuel
Cunha, Rosario Rosales, Daisy Contreras, Yer Xiong, Steve Dailey, Martha
De Latorre, and Joe Lenigan.
The public comment period closed at 12:19 P.M.
Council discussion on this item included: Role of Staff and Planning
Commission in reviewing and processing applications; importance of critical
review and public input in the decision-making process; the impact of noise
and environmental factors on autistic students; the project's proximity to a
program for autistic and special needs populations; Community
Engagement and Meetings between the applicant group and the Rivendale
Community; whether alternative developments were considered that would
be more acceptable to the residents or the community; efforts made to
address community concerns and preferences.
NOT APPROVED