City of Fresno  
City Hall Council Chambers  
2600 Fresno Street  
Meeting Minutes - Final  
Wednesday, November 17, 2021  
6:00 PM  
Regular Meeting  
In Person and/or Electronic  
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS  
Planning Commission  
Chairperson – Peter Vang  
Vice Chair – Brad Hardie  
Commissioner – David Criner  
Commissioner – Haley M Wagner  
Commissioner – Monica Diaz  
Commissioner – Robert A. Fuentes  
Commissioner – Vacant  
PUBLIC ADVISORY  
THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS AND CITY HALL WILL BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AT  
LIMITED CAPACITY  
THE PLANNING COMMISSION WELCOMES YOU TO COUNCIL CHAMBERS,  
LOCATED AT CITY HALL, 2600 FRESNO STREET, FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 93721.  
The meeting can also be viewed live at 6:00 P.M. on Comcast Channel 96 and AT&T  
channel 99.  
You can also participate in the meeting on our City’s website click on the URL  
Members of the public are encouraged to participate electronically because of  
reduced capacity of seating in the Chambers to allow for social distancing. Masks will  
be required for the vaccinated and unvaccinated.  
Pursuant to the Executive Order, and in compliance with the Americans with  
Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in the Commission  
meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office, 559-621-7650 within 48 hours of the  
meeting.  
PUBLIC COMMENT:  
The following options are available for members of the public who want to address  
Planning Commission:  
a) eComments is a tool for citizens to use to make comments on agenda items. It will  
be open during the Council meeting and closed at the end of the meeting and will be  
a part of the official record. The User Agreement and Procedures document for  
b) eComments will be a maximum of 450 words.  
OR  
2. You are invited to a Zoom webinar.  
a) If you would like to speak on an agenda item, you can access the meeting remotely  
from a PC, Mac, iPad, iPhone, or Android device: Please use this URL  
b) Those addressing Commission must state their name for the record.  
OR  
3. Join by phone: 1-669-900-9128  
Webinar ID: 972 2311 8765  
a) Those addressing the Commission must state their name and address for the  
record.  
4. Email to: PublicCommentsPlanning@fresno.gov  
a) Attendees may also email comments to be read during the meeting. Please include  
the agenda date and item number you wish to speak on in the subject line of your  
email. Include your name, and address for the record, at the top of the body of your  
email.  
b) Emails will be a maximum of 450 words.  
c) All comments received will be distributed to the Planning Commission prior and  
during the meeting and will be a part of the official record.  
d) Notwithstanding subsection c) above, unless otherwise required by law to be  
accepted by the City at or prior to a Commission meeting or hearing, no documents  
shall be accepted for Commission review unless they are submitted to the Planning  
and Development Department at least 24 hours prior to the commencement of the  
Commission meeting at which the associated agenda item is to be heard.  
All participants will be on mute until they are called upon at which point they will be  
unmuted. To prevent participants from having their video on, we will remove the  
option to show their video.  
Pursuant to the Executive Order, and in compliance with the Americans with  
Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in the Planning  
Commission meeting, please contact the Planning Division, 559-621-8277 within 48  
hours of the meeting.  
The City of Fresno thanks you in advance for taking all precautions to prevent  
spreading COVID-19 virus.  
I. ROLL CALL  
Commissioner Hardie called meeting to order at 6:02 pm.  
STAFF: Clark, Sanchez,Tackett, Siegrist,Trejo, Salazar, Richardson,  
Lara, Valenzuela, Aponte (Planning and Development) R. Gonzales  
(City Attorney's Office) Benelli (Public Works) Zack (Economic  
Development).  
Present 8 -  
Chairperson Peter Vang, Chair Peter Vang, Vice Chair Brad  
Hardie, Vice Chair Brad Hardie, Commissioner David Criner  
, Commissioner Robert Fuentes, Commissioner Haley M.  
Wagner, and Commissioner Monica Diaz  
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE  
III. PROCEDURES - PROCEDIMIENTOS - KEV SAB LAJ  
Commissioner Hardie outlined the meeting procedures for the benefit of the  
public.  
IV. AGENDA APPROVAL  
No changes recommended to the Agenda.  
On motion of Commissioner Diaz, seconded by Commissioner  
Wagner,the above AGENDA was APPROVED. The motion carried by  
the following vote:  
Aye: 6 -  
Chairperson Vang, Chair Vang, Vice Chair Hardie,  
Commissioner Fuentes, Commissioner Wagner, and  
Commissioner Diaz  
Absent: 1 - Commissioner Criner  
V. CONSENT CALENDAR  
On motion of Commissioner Diaz, seconded by Commissioner  
Fuentes,the CONSENT CALENDAR was APPROVED. The motion  
carried by the following vote:  
Aye: 7 -  
Chairperson Vang, Chair Vang, Vice Chair Hardie,  
Commissioner Criner , Commissioner Fuentes,  
Commissioner Wagner, and Commissioner Diaz  
Consideration of the Fresno City Planning Commission Meeting Schedule  
for Calendar Year 2022  
V-A.  
VI. REPORTS BY COMMISSIONERS  
VII. CONTINUED MATTERS  
VIII. NEW MATTERS  
Election of Chair and Vice Chair  
VIII-A  
Commissioner Hardie suggested Commissioner Vang become Chair and  
made a motion that was unanimously approved.  
There was no opposition to Commissioner Hardie remaining as Vice Chair.  
On motion of Vice Chair Hardie, seconded by Commissioner Diaz,  
Commissioner Vang was appointed Chair and Commissioner Hardie  
remained Vice Chair. The motion carried by the following vote:  
Aye: 7 -  
Chairperson Vang, Chair Vang, Vice Chair Hardie,  
Commissioner Criner , Commissioner Fuentes,  
Commissioner Wagner, and Commissioner Diaz  
CONTINUE TO DECEMBER 1, 2021  
VIII-B.  
Hearing to consider a proposed Development Agreement by and between  
the City of Fresno and Parc West Development, Inc. relating to the  
development of the Parc West Project (Council District 1).  
1. RECOMMEND APPROVAL (to the City Council) of the  
adoption of an addendum to the previously certified Final  
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) SCH No. 2020039061,  
pursuant to Section 15164 of the California Environmental  
Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.  
2. RECOMMEND APPROVAL (to City Council) of an  
ordinance approving the Development Agreement by and  
between the City of Fresno and Parc West Development, Inc.  
for purposes of the Parc West Project, pertaining to ±160  
acres of property located on the west side of North Grantland  
Avenue between West Ashlan Avenue and the West  
Gettysburg Avenue alignment.  
Consideration of Plan Amendment and Rezone Application No.  
P21-01875, Vesting Tentative Tract Map Nos. 6238 and 6246, and Final  
Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (FSEIR) State Clearinghouse  
(SCH) No. 2000021003 relative to property generally located between  
North Friant Road, East Copper Avenue, North Willow Avenue and the  
VIII-C.  
East Silaxo Road (Council District 6)  
1. RECOMMEND CERTIFICATION (to the City Council) of Final SEIR  
SCH No. 2000021003 for the proposed development; and,  
a.  
b.  
RECOMMEND ADOPTION (to the City Council) of Findings of  
Fact as required by Public Resources Code Section 21082(a)  
and CEQA Guidelines, Section 15091; and,  
RECOMMEND ADOPTION (to the City Council) of the  
Statement of Overriding Considerations as required by Public  
Resources Code, Section 21081(b) and CEQA Guidelines,  
Section 15093; and  
c.  
RECOMMEND APPROVAL (to the City Council) of a Mitigation  
Monitoring and Reporting Program as required by Public  
Resources Code Section 21081.6 and CEQA Guidelines Section  
15092; and,  
2. RECOMMEND  
APPROVAL  
(to  
the  
City  
Council)  
of  
Plan  
Amendment Application P21-01875 proposing to amend the Fresno  
General Plan from the Medium Density Residential (± 35.59 acres)  
planned land use designation to Low Density Residential (±35.59  
acres), Medium High Density Residential (± 0.93 acres) planned land  
use designation to Urban Neighborhood (± 0.93 acres), Medium High  
Density Residential (± 7.23 acres) planned land use designation to  
Medium Density Residential (± 7.23 acres), Medium High Density  
Residential (± 0.79 acres) planned land use designation to Medium  
Low Density Residential (± 0.79 acres), Medium High Density  
Residential (± 2.68 acres) planned land use designation to  
Community Commercial (± 2.68 acres), Open Space, Golf Course (±  
2.07 acres) planned land use designation to Medium Low Density  
Residential (± 2.07 acres), Community Commercial (± 1.17 acres)  
planned land use designation to Low Density Residential (± 1.17  
acres), Community Commercial (± 8.17 acres) planned land use  
designation to Urban Neighborhood (± 8.17 acres), Community  
Commercial (± 2.68 acres) planned land use designation to Medium  
Low Density Residential (± 2.68 acres), General Commercial (± 4.53  
acres) planned land use designation to Low Density Residential (±  
4.53 acres).  
3. RECOMMEND APPROVAL (to the City Council) of Rezone  
Application No. P21-01875 proposing to amend the Official Zone  
Map to reclassify: ± 35.59 acres of property from the RS-5/UGM/cz  
(Single  
Management/conditions of zoning) zone district to RS-3/UGM/cz  
(Single-Family Residential, Low Density/Urban Growth  
Family  
Residential,  
Medium  
Density/Urban  
Growth  
Management/conditions of zoning) zone district, ± 0.93 acres of  
property from the RM-1/UGM/cz (Multi-Family Residential, Medium  
High Density/Urban Growth Management/conditions of zoning) zone  
district  
to  
RM-2/UGM/cz  
(Multi-Family  
Residential,  
Urban  
Neighborhood/Urban Growth Management/conditions of zoning) zone  
district, ± 7.23 acres of property from the RM-1/UGM/cz (Multi Family  
Residential,  
Medium  
High  
Density/Urban  
Growth  
Management/conditions of zoning) zone district to RS-5/UGM/cz  
(Single  
Family  
Residential,  
Medium  
Density/Urban  
Growth  
Management/conditions of zoning) zone district,  
±
0.79 acre of  
property from the RM-1/UGM/cz (Multi Family Residential, Medium  
High Density/Urban Growth Management/conditions of zoning) zone  
district to RS-4/UGM/cz (Single Family Residential, Medium Low  
Density/Urban Growth Management/conditions of zoning) zone  
district, ± 2.68 acres of property from the RM-1/UGM/cz (Multi-Family  
Residential,  
Medium  
High  
Density/Urban  
Growth  
Management/conditions of zoning) zone district to CC/UGM/cz  
(Community Commercial/Urban Growth Management/conditions of  
zoning) zone district, ± 2.07 acres of property from the PR/UGM/cz  
(Parks and Recreation/Urban Growth Management/conditions of  
zoning) zone district to RS-4/UGM/cz (Single Family Residential,  
Medium Low Density/Urban Growth Management/conditions of  
zoning) zone district, ± 1.17 acres of property from the CC/UGM/cz  
(Community Commercial/Urban Growth Management/conditions of  
zoning) zone district to RS-3/UGM/cz (Single Family Residential, Low  
Density/Urban Growth Management/conditions of zoning) zone  
district, ± 8.17 acres of property from the CC/UGM/cz (Community  
Commercial/Urban Growth Management/conditions of zoning) zone  
district  
to  
RM-2/UGM/cz  
(Multi-Family  
Residential,  
Urban  
Neighborhood/Urban Growth Management/conditions of zoning) zone  
district, ± 2.68 acres of property from the CC/UGM/cz (Community  
Commercial/Urban Growth Management/conditions of zoning) zone  
district to RS-4/UGM/cz (Single Family Residential, Medium Low  
Density /Urban Growth Management/conditions of zoning) zone  
district, and ± 4.53 acres of property from the GC/UGM/cz (General  
Commercial/Urban Growth Management/conditions of zoning) zone  
district to RS-3/UGM/cz (Single Family Residential, Low Density  
/Urban Growth Management/conditions of zoning) zone district.  
4. RECOMMEND ADOPTION (to the City Council) of findings pursuant  
to Government Code Section 65863(b)(2) that there is substantial  
evidence in the record that remaining sites identified in the Housing  
Element can accommodate the City of Fresno’s share of the Regional  
Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA).  
5. RECOMMEND APPROVAL (to the City Council) of Vesting  
Tentative Tract Map No. 6238/UGM which requests authorization to  
subdivide approximately 14.01 acres of property for purposes of  
creating 47-lot single family residential planned development  
a
subdivision located near the southeast corner of North Alicante Drive  
and North Crest View Drive subject to compliance with the Conditions  
of Approval dated November 17, 2021.  
6. RECOMMEND APPROVAL (to the City Council) of Planned  
Development No. P21-02863 subject to compliance with the  
Conditions of Approval dated November 17, 2021.  
7. RECOMMEND APPROVAL (to the City Council) of Vesting  
Tentative Tract Map No. 6246/UGM which requests authorization to  
subdivide approximately 41.58 acres of property for purposes of  
creating  
a
144-lot single family residential subdivision near the  
northeast corner of North Alicante Drive and North Crest View Drive  
subject to compliance with the Conditions of Approval dated  
November 17, 2021.  
Supervising Planner, Israel Trejo, made a presentation on the item and  
introduced Travis Crawford & Jose Benevidez as consultants on the item.  
Commissioner Wagner asked Trejo for clarification on the decreasing or  
increasing of dwellings.  
Fuentes asked Staff why the Commission is asked to redesignate and  
rezone areas when there is no proposed projects or maps available.  
Applicant Jeff Roberts and Gary McDonald from the Assemi Group  
(applicants) from his team spoke and presented .  
No public comment in favor or opposition on this item.  
On motion of Vice Chair Hardie, seconded by Commissioner Diaz, that  
the above Action Item be APPROVED. The motion carried by the  
following vote:  
Aye: 7 -  
Chairperson Vang, Chair Vang, Vice Chair Hardie,  
Commissioner Criner , Commissioner Fuentes,  
Commissioner Wagner, and Commissioner Diaz  
Consideration  
of  
Planned  
Development  
Permit  
Application  
No.  
VIII-D.  
P21-01805, a request to modify applicable development code standards  
relating to block, street, and alley standards to allow for the vacation of an  
existing alley for a proposed mixed-use development located at 1510 Van  
Ness Avenue, on the north side of Stanislaus Street, between Van Ness  
Avenue and ‘L’ Street in downtown Fresno (Council District 3) - Planning &  
Development Department.  
1. CONSIDER Environmental Assessment No. P21-02255/P21-01805,  
dated November 17, 2021, a determination that the proposed  
project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act  
(CEQA) through a Class 32 Categorical Exemption; and,  
2. DENY the applicant’s appeal and UPHOLD the action of the Planning  
and  
Development  
Department  
Director  
to  
deny  
Planned  
Development Permit Application No. P21-01805 requesting to  
modify applicable development code standards relating to block,  
street, and alley standards to allow for the vacation of a portion of an  
existing alley for a proposed mix-use development in the downtown  
planning area.  
Planner, Jose Valenzuela, made a presentation on this item.  
Sal Gonzales, the developer on project, spoke representing the applicant  
about the benefits of the proposed project.  
Fuentes voiced concern about findings from the Fresno Municipal Code.  
Gonzales and the Commissioner discussed these apprehensions and  
addressed the findings.  
Darius Assemi (Granville Homes) spoke in favor of the proposed project.  
Robert Arnt, a retired police officer & director of security for the proposed  
project, spoke about criminal activity in alleys and spoke in favor of the  
item.  
No public comment in opposition or rebuttal from applicant  
Vice Chair Hardie stated he was torn on the item and asked for a motion  
and findings from the dais.  
After a motion was made, Senior Deputy City Attorney Gonzales explained  
to the Commission findings needed to be stated when making a motion.  
Diaz explained due to the housing crisis, she found this item a matter of  
common sense. Wagner explained each of the 4 findings since Staff already  
explained the 5th one in the staff report and the roll call vote was then  
taken.  
On motion of Commissioner Diaz, seconded by Commissioner  
Wagner, that the above Action Item be APPROVED. The motion  
carried by the following vote:  
Aye: 7 -  
Chairperson Vang, Chair Vang, Vice Chair Hardie,  
Commissioner Criner , Commissioner Fuentes,  
Commissioner Wagner, and Commissioner Diaz  
IX. REPORT BY SECRETARY  
Director Clark reminded the Commission of the next meetings (December  
1st and 15th). She also welcomed Chair Vang in his new roll and offered  
commission training.  
X. SCHEDULED ORAL COMMUNICATIONS  
XI. UNSCHEDULED ORAL COMMUNICATIONS  
XII. ADJOURNMENT  
Meeting was adjourned at 7:45 pm