Environmental Assessment No. P20-04209/P20-04211 pertaining to ±18.9
acres of property located on the southeast corner of South West and West
Church Avenues (Council District 3)
Department.
-
Planning
&
Development
1. ADOPT the Negative Declaration as prepared for Environmental
Assessment No. P20-04211/P20-04209, dated March 4, 2022, for
the proposed project pursuant to the State of California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and,
2. RESOLUTION - Approving Plan Amendment Application No. P20-
04209, requesting authorization to amend the Fresno General Plan
and Southwest Fresno Specific Plan to change the planned land
use designation for the subject property from Residential - Medium
Density (±18.9 acres) to Employment - Light Industrial (±18.9
acres); and,
3. BILL
-
(For introduction and adoption)
-
Approving Rezone
Application No. P20-04209, requesting authorization to amend the
Official Zoning Map of the City of Fresno to rezone the subject
property from the RS-5/UGM (Residential Single Family, Medium
Density/Urban Growth Management) (±18.9 acres) zone district to
the IL (Light Industrial/Urban Growth Management) (±18.9 acres)
zone district in accordance with the Plan Amendment Application;
and
4. APPROVE
-
Development Permit Application No. P20-04211,
requesting authorization to construct a state of the art ±477,470
square-foot two (2) story food production, warehousing, and
distribution facility, subject to compliance with Conditions of
Approval dated May 18, 2022.
The above hearing was called to order at 11:46 A.M. Supervising Planner
Siegrist introduced the item to Council.
Upon call, the following members of the public addressed Council: Brunette
Harris, Lilly, Ivanka Saunders, Shaun Robinson, Reef Goodwin, John
Kinsey, Mitch Michino, Emily Brent, Nisha Vyas, Kiel Lopez-Schmidt, Lisa
Flores, Anna Wells, Eric Payne Michaelynn Lewis. Public Comment was
closed at 12:22 P.M.
Council discussion on this item included: the unified opposition by the black
community; the level of community engagement by the businesses in the
area; the support for the project from the District 3 Residents Committee and
the Planning Commission; the issues created by placing single family
residential zoning next to heavy industrial uses and the need for buffers; and
the environmental study conclusion that pollution would be reduced by
consolidating facilities.