Fresno Logo
File #: ID#14-222    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Discussion Item Status: Passed
File created: 7/24/2014 In control: City Council
On agenda: 8/28/2014 Final action: 8/28/2014
Title: Reject all proposals responding to City's Request for Qualification for Asset Management Services for Management of City Real Estate Assets - Bid File 060614 (Citywide)
Sponsors: Finance Department
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL



August 28, 2014


FROM: GARY WATAHIRA, Purchasing Manager
Finance Department

SUBJECT
Title
Reject all proposals responding to City's Request for Qualification for Asset Management Services for Management of City Real Estate Assets - Bid File 060614 (Citywide)
Body
RECOMMENDATION

The City Manager's Office recommends the City Council reject all proposals received for asset management services for management of City real estate assets.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The City Manager's Office solicited and received proposals in June 2014 for asset management services for the management of City real estate assets. One response was received. During the bid evaluation process it was determined that additional responses to the Request for Qualification (RFQ) would be desirable. It was anticipated that rejecting all bids and reissuing the RFQ with additional time for potential responders to respond and more widespread distribution would likely yield additional responses.

BACKGROUND

On March 6, 2014, the City Council passed the Asset Management Act (the "Act"), which requires, in part, that the City retain a qualified brokerage firm to manage City real estate assets.

Pursuant to the Act's requirements, the City Manager's Office issued the RFQ seeking to retain the services of a qualified real estate brokerage firm to assist the City with the overall management of the City's real estate assets. The RFQ was advertised as follows: (1) published on the City's website on June 6, 2014; (2) published in the Business Journal; and (3) distributed to potential proposers. Only one sealed response was received and opened in a public bid opening on or about July 11, 2014.

During the bid evaluation, it was determined that additional bids would be desirable for the City to make its best choice. Accordingly, it was decided that rejecting all bids and reissuing the RFQ with additional time for potential responders to re...

Click here for full text